Sport Investors League
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business

Sport Investors League

  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business
Business

Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

by admin August 3, 2024
August 3, 2024
Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has overturned a jury’s $4.7 billion verdict in the class-action lawsuit filed by “Sunday Ticket” subscribers against the NFL and has granted judgment to the NFL.

U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled Thursday that the testimony of two witnesses for the subscribers had flawed methodologies and should have been excluded.

“Without the testimonies of Dr. [Daniel] Rascher and Dr. [John] Zona, no reasonable jury could have found class-wide injury or damages,” Gutierrez wrote at the end of his 16-page ruling.

The jury on June 27 awarded $4.7 billion in damages to residential and commercial subscribers after it ruled the NFL violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses in the United States who paid for the package on DirecTV of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons.

The jury of five men and three women found the NFL liable for $4,610,331,671.74 in damages to the residential class (home subscribers) and $96,928,272.90 in damages to the commercial class (business subscribers).

Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could have been liable for $14,121,779,833.92.

It is not the first time the NFL has won a judgment as matter of law in this case, which has been going on since 2015.

In 2017, U.S. District Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell dismissed the lawsuit and ruled for the NFL because she said “Sunday Ticket” did not reduce output of NFL games and that even though DirecTV might have charged inflated prices, that did not “on its own, constitute harm to competition” because it had to negotiate with the NFL to carry the package.

Two years later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case.

It is likely the plaintiffs will again appeal to the 9th Circuit.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Intel shares plunge 28%, dragging down global chip stocks
next post
Strategic Investment from Sichuan Hebang Biotechnology

Related Posts

The collapse of a fintech firm with 10...

May 23, 2024

Capital One outage drags into Friday afternoon, leaving...

January 18, 2025

How Fanatics is teaching business acumen to pro...

June 25, 2025

Biden blocks Japan’s Nippon Steel from $15 billion...

January 7, 2025

Home Depot co-founder Bernie Marcus dies

November 7, 2024

Intel CEO retires as chipmaker loses ground in...

December 3, 2024

NFL-backed group lines up ‘Sunday Ticket’ streaming for...

July 4, 2024

Disney wins the 2024 box office as year-end...

January 16, 2025

Panera Brands CEO steps down; CFO to fill...

January 9, 2025

Walmart is using its own fintech firm to...

June 11, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Momentum Leaders Are Rotating — Here’s How to Find Them

      July 25, 2025
    • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

      July 25, 2025
    • Trump foe Boasberg orders DOJ to detail status of CECOT migrants sent to Venezuela

      July 25, 2025
    • Hamas ‘hardens’ stance in ceasefire talks as Netanyahu recalls negotiation team

      July 25, 2025
    • White House sends mixed signals in Russia ‘hoax’ blame game

      July 25, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,036)
    • Investing (2,690)
    • Politics (3,310)
    • Stocks (1,154)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sportinvestorsleague.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 sportinvestorsleague.com | All Rights Reserved