Sport Investors League
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business

Sport Investors League

  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business
Politics

Federal judge hits DOJ for ‘indict first, investigate later’ approach in court hearing

by admin November 7, 2025
November 7, 2025
Federal judge hits DOJ for ‘indict first, investigate later’ approach in court hearing

A federal judge criticized the Justice Department for allegedly being too quick to indict in high-profile cases on Wednesday.

Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick of the Eastern District of Virginia made the comments during a brief hearing regarding the case against former FBI Director James Comey.

‘Right now, we are in a bit of a feeling of indict first, investigate later,’ Fitzpatrick said in the hearing, which lasted less than an hour.

Fitzpatrick questioned prosecutors about their handling of data acquired from a number of search warrants between 2019 and 2020, information which is now being used in Comey’s case. The judge pressed prosecutors on whether they may have viewed information that may be protected by attorney-client privilege.

Fitzpatrick also noted the size of the trove of documents, saying Comey’s defense team has been placed at a disadvantage with a limited time to view the set.

‘The government has had this for five and a half years … this is an unfair burden the government is placing on the defense, but I don’t see another path forward,’ the judge said.

Comey’s team has sought to have his case dismissed, arguing he is the victim of selective prosecution by President Donald Trump.

The DOJ denied in a 48-page filing that Trump’s September Truth Social post calling on U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute prominent political adversaries, including Comey, Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and New York Attorney General Letitia James, had any influence on the decision to bring charges.

‘These posts reflect the President’s view that the defendant has committed crimes that should be met with prosecution. They may even suggest that the President disfavors the defendant. But they are not direct evidence of a vindictive motive,’ prosecutors argued.

‘The defendant spins a tale that requires leaps of logic and a big dose of cynicism, then he calls the President’s post a direct admission,’ they continued. ‘There is no direct admission of discriminatory purpose. To the contrary, the only direct admission from the President is that DOJ officials decided whether to prosecute, not him.’

Fox News’ Ashley Carnahan contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Democrats see mandate after 2025 wins — Republicans say it’s a mirage
next post
Surface Metals Inc. Grants Options and Provides Update on Financial Marketing

Related Posts

House Dems insist primary is ‘open’ despite rushing...

July 23, 2024

NASA spent $13M on DEI under Biden while...

March 12, 2025

Biden to meet with national security team ahead...

August 5, 2024

Donald Trump Jr takes personal trip to Greenland...

January 7, 2025

SCOOP: House GOP eyes more Medicaid reforms in...

September 4, 2025

Thune lays groundwork for nuclear option in Senate...

September 9, 2025

NY v. Trump: Closing arguments to begin as...

May 28, 2024

Here’s what happened during President Donald Trump’s eighth...

March 16, 2025

With 29 days until voting starts, ‘election season’...

August 8, 2024

Trump and Xi skip Taiwan talk despite years...

November 1, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • US envoy gave Russian aide tips on how to sell Ukraine deal to Trump: report

      November 27, 2025
    • Trump touts ‘progress’ on Ukraine-Russia deal, admits it’s ‘one of the more difficult’ conflicts to solve

      November 27, 2025
    • Politician named Adolf Hitler becomes focal point of local election campaign

      November 27, 2025
    • Appeals court upholds $1 million penalty against Trump over ‘frivolous’ Clinton, Comey lawsuit

      November 27, 2025
    • Judge dismisses 2020 election interference case against Trump, granting Georgia’s request

      November 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,136)
    • Investing (3,577)
    • Politics (4,354)
    • Stocks (1,155)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sportinvestorsleague.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 sportinvestorsleague.com | All Rights Reserved