Sport Investors League
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business

Sport Investors League

  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business
Politics

Sotomayor breaks with Jackson in Supreme Court decision over Trump cuts to federal workforce

by admin July 10, 2025
July 10, 2025
Sotomayor breaks with Jackson in Supreme Court decision over Trump cuts to federal workforce

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent in a Supreme Court order handed down on Tuesday stood out enough that it prompted one of her liberal colleagues to voice disagreement with her.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, said in a brief concurrence that the high court’s 8-1 order clearing the way for President Donald Trump to continue downsizing the government was the right decision.

‘I agree with Justice Jackson that the President cannot restructure federal agencies in a manner inconsistent with congressional mandates,’ Sotomayor wrote. ‘Here, however, the relevant Executive Order directs agencies to plan reorganizations and reductions in force ‘consistent with applicable law’ … and the resulting joint memorandum from the Office of Management and Budget and Office of Personnel Management reiterates as much.’

Sotomayor’s remarks were included as part of a short two-page order from the Supreme Court saying the executive order Trump signed in February directing federal agencies to plan for ‘large-scale reductions in force (RIFs), consistent with applicable law’ was likely lawful.

The Supreme Court said it had no opinion at this stage on the legality of any actual job cuts and that that question was not before the high court.

But Jackson felt differently, according to her 15-page dissent affixed to the order.

Jackson, the most junior justice and an appointee of former President Joe Biden, said a lower court judge was right to pause any further reductions to the federal workforce. Jackson lectured her colleagues for thinking otherwise.

‘That temporary, practical, harm-reducing preservation of the status quo was no match for this Court’s demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President’s legally dubious actions in an emergency posture,’ Jackson said.

Any future government downsizing would come on top of thousands of government employees already losing their jobs or opting to accept buy-out plans as part of Trump’s stated goals to scale down the federal government and make it run more efficiently.

The Supreme Court’s order arose from a lawsuit brought by labor organizations and nonprofits, who alleged that the president’s decision to dramatically slash the federal workforce infringed on Congress’s authority over approving and funding government jobs.

The order was issued on an emergency basis and is only temporary. It will remain in place while the Trump administration appeals the lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Biden doctor dodges questions in speedy House closed-door interview
next post
New book sheds light on Harris decision to pick Walz as her running mate over Shapiro: ‘Went with her gut’

Related Posts

Former Republican U.S. senator endorses Kamala Harris, says...

September 27, 2024

Marine critic of Afghan withdrawal to lead rank-and-file...

December 12, 2024

DAVID MARCUS: GOP trio missed the whole point...

January 26, 2025

Slovenia approves law to legalize assisted dying for...

July 19, 2025

DOGE boasts dozens of contract cancellations on Wednesday,...

February 13, 2025

Mexico sues Google for changing ‘Gulf of Mexico’...

May 10, 2025

Ex-Fauci top adviser offers apologies and excuses after...

May 23, 2024

Trans star of hit HBO series says renewed...

February 24, 2025

Kurilla warfare: Meet the general leading US military...

June 20, 2025

Former Dem fundraiser sees ‘overwhelmingly positive’ response as...

January 14, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Who is Steve Ricchetti, the longtime Biden confidante questioned in Comer’s cover-up probe?

      July 31, 2025
    • Trump says his Aug 1 tariff deadline ‘will not be extended’ – here are the countries that might not make it

      July 31, 2025
    • Trump admin sanctions Brazilian judge overseeing Bolsonaro coup-plot probe

      July 31, 2025
    • Top GOP senator demands probe into whether Jack Smith ‘unlawfully’ tried to influence 2024 election

      July 31, 2025
    • SCOTUS to discuss Ghislaine Maxwell’s case privately in September at post-summer conference

      July 31, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,044)
    • Investing (2,734)
    • Politics (3,360)
    • Stocks (1,155)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sportinvestorsleague.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 sportinvestorsleague.com | All Rights Reserved