Sport Investors League
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business

Sport Investors League

  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business
Politics

Voters widely oppose taxpayer-funded gender surgeries, revealing Democrat Party’s vulnerability: poll

by admin April 15, 2025
April 15, 2025
Voters widely oppose taxpayer-funded gender surgeries, revealing Democrat Party’s vulnerability: poll

Taxpayer-funded gender transition surgeries remain a vulnerable issue for the Democratic Party that most voters oppose, according to a recent survey by the American Principles Project (APP) targeting likely midterm voters.

‘We wanted to help educate Americans, but mostly legislators, about where Americans or how Americans feel about funding for gender identity programs, specifically in healthcare services, especially in light of Congress deliberating on spending and doing the reconciliation bills and all of that,’ Terry Schilling, APP executive director, told Fox News Digital in an interview. ‘We want to make sure that they knew just how unpopular these programs are to fund by tax dollars.’

The survey, conducted in early April with 1,500 respondents, found that 43% of people who voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris in the last election are against using taxpayer money to fund gender transition procedures, including surgeries and hormone treatments. 

‘That was a little bit higher than we typically see for Democrat voters,’ Schilling said. APP is a socially conservative nonprofit advocacy group.

During the last few months of President Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, his administration released high-budget ads targeting transgender women in women’s sports that may have helped move the needle with swing voters, with one ad famously proclaiming ‘Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you.’

The ad focused on Harris’ track record of ushering in sex change procedures for incarcerated people in California.

The survey found that nearly 66% of Americans don’t think the federal government should be funding gender transition procedures, including puberty blockers, hormones and surgeries. The survey did not differentiate between minors and adults.

‘The higher ups, like the elected officials in the Democratic Party, are going the other way, and it’s not going to work out well for them,’ Schilling said. ‘Democrats are in a really tough spot. They have to choose between 20 to 30% of the base, which supports paying for gender transitions and surgeries with tax dollars, or the swing voters, which swing voters do not want at all.’

In 2021, former President Joe Biden signed an executive order directing federal agencies to expand anti-discrimination protections to include sexual orientation and gender identity, including in healthcare. He also reinterpreted Title IX to ensure those same protections applied within educational settings.

The administration supported state-level initiatives, such as Colorado’s inclusion of transgender treatments in its essential health benefits, under the Affordable Care Act.

‘I think that the more Donald Trump’s been talking about it and bringing attention to it, the more people are going to the Republican side on the issue,’ Schilling said.

Another question of the survey asked respondents, ‘If the November 2026 general election for U.S. Congress was held today, and you knew that the Democratic candidate supports allowing federal tax dollars to pay for gender transition procedures, including puberty blockers, hormones, and surgeries, would you vote for the Republican or Democratic candidate for U.S. Congress?’

Fifty-two percent of respondents said they would vote for the Republican candidate, while 39% said they would back the Democrat.

Trump has clamped down on ‘radical gender ideology’ since taking office, cutting all federal funding for gender transition surgeries for minors and through public healthcare. He has also banned biological males from competing in women’s sports and mandated that transgender individuals serve according to their biological sex in the military.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Whitmer explains her Oval Office folder fiasco
next post
Pete Marocco, mastermind behind dismantling of USAID projects, leaves State Department

Related Posts

Trump extends US security guarantee to Qatar, elevating...

October 4, 2025

Trump-backed bills on activist judges, non-citizen voting heading...

April 8, 2025

Biden caters to ‘far-left’ dark money groups with...

July 30, 2024

Israel’s military will remain in Lebanon as ceasefire...

January 25, 2025

If Gaza’s famine was real, how come it...

November 15, 2025

Trump announces North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum as...

November 15, 2024

Trump’s America First strategy builds deterrence through strong...

November 12, 2025

Hillary Clinton swipes Democrats, gives Republicans ‘credit’: ‘Nothing...

May 26, 2024

Epstein files explode open as DOJ details discovery...

December 20, 2025

Trump admin fights in court to keep White...

December 17, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Trump responds to post suggesting Rubio as president of Cuba: ‘Sounds good to me’

      January 12, 2026
    • Federal judge blocks Trump administration from enforcing mail-in voting rules in executive order

      January 12, 2026
    • US used sonic weapon on Venezuelan troops, report shared by Leavitt claims

      January 12, 2026
    • Expert warns of ‘extreme violence’ in Venezuelan mining as Trump admin eyes mineral reserves

      January 12, 2026
    • Iran’s collapse or survival hinges on one choice inside the Revolutionary Guard

      January 12, 2026

    Categories

    • Business (1,145)
    • Investing (3,852)
    • Politics (4,708)
    • Stocks (1,155)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sportinvestorsleague.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2026 sportinvestorsleague.com | All Rights Reserved