Sport Investors League
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business

Sport Investors League

  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business
Business

Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

by admin August 3, 2024
August 3, 2024
Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has overturned a jury’s $4.7 billion verdict in the class-action lawsuit filed by “Sunday Ticket” subscribers against the NFL and has granted judgment to the NFL.

U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled Thursday that the testimony of two witnesses for the subscribers had flawed methodologies and should have been excluded.

“Without the testimonies of Dr. [Daniel] Rascher and Dr. [John] Zona, no reasonable jury could have found class-wide injury or damages,” Gutierrez wrote at the end of his 16-page ruling.

The jury on June 27 awarded $4.7 billion in damages to residential and commercial subscribers after it ruled the NFL violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses in the United States who paid for the package on DirecTV of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons.

The jury of five men and three women found the NFL liable for $4,610,331,671.74 in damages to the residential class (home subscribers) and $96,928,272.90 in damages to the commercial class (business subscribers).

Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could have been liable for $14,121,779,833.92.

It is not the first time the NFL has won a judgment as matter of law in this case, which has been going on since 2015.

In 2017, U.S. District Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell dismissed the lawsuit and ruled for the NFL because she said “Sunday Ticket” did not reduce output of NFL games and that even though DirecTV might have charged inflated prices, that did not “on its own, constitute harm to competition” because it had to negotiate with the NFL to carry the package.

Two years later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case.

It is likely the plaintiffs will again appeal to the 9th Circuit.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Intel shares plunge 28%, dragging down global chip stocks
next post
Strategic Investment from Sichuan Hebang Biotechnology

Related Posts

Nvidia to report earnings amid infrastructure spending, DeepSeek...

February 27, 2025

Crash victims’ families prepare to make what could...

September 4, 2025

McDonald’s is the latest company to roll back...

January 8, 2025

Hasbro forecasts as much as $300 million impact...

April 25, 2025

What Trump’s Nvidia and AMD China deal means...

August 12, 2025

Cracker Barrel will go back to old logo...

August 28, 2025

Crop tour projects record 2025 U.S. corn harvest,...

August 24, 2025

FTX customers may get their money back, but...

May 10, 2024

NFL season expected to spur record $35 billion...

September 4, 2024

Target CEO addresses price gouging accusations in retail

August 22, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • How the White House turkey pardon became an American tradition

      November 28, 2025
    • Battery Storage Market Surging as Electricity Demand Enters New Era

      November 28, 2025
    • Nevada Sunrise Metals

      November 28, 2025
    • Aurum Completes $22.98M Montage Share Sale

      November 28, 2025
    • Option to AcquireScandinavian Copper-Gold Project

      November 28, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,136)
    • Investing (3,586)
    • Politics (4,355)
    • Stocks (1,155)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sportinvestorsleague.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 sportinvestorsleague.com | All Rights Reserved