Sport Investors League
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business

Sport Investors League

  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business
Business

Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

by admin August 3, 2024
August 3, 2024
Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has overturned a jury’s $4.7 billion verdict in the class-action lawsuit filed by “Sunday Ticket” subscribers against the NFL and has granted judgment to the NFL.

U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled Thursday that the testimony of two witnesses for the subscribers had flawed methodologies and should have been excluded.

“Without the testimonies of Dr. [Daniel] Rascher and Dr. [John] Zona, no reasonable jury could have found class-wide injury or damages,” Gutierrez wrote at the end of his 16-page ruling.

The jury on June 27 awarded $4.7 billion in damages to residential and commercial subscribers after it ruled the NFL violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses in the United States who paid for the package on DirecTV of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons.

The jury of five men and three women found the NFL liable for $4,610,331,671.74 in damages to the residential class (home subscribers) and $96,928,272.90 in damages to the commercial class (business subscribers).

Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could have been liable for $14,121,779,833.92.

It is not the first time the NFL has won a judgment as matter of law in this case, which has been going on since 2015.

In 2017, U.S. District Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell dismissed the lawsuit and ruled for the NFL because she said “Sunday Ticket” did not reduce output of NFL games and that even though DirecTV might have charged inflated prices, that did not “on its own, constitute harm to competition” because it had to negotiate with the NFL to carry the package.

Two years later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case.

It is likely the plaintiffs will again appeal to the 9th Circuit.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Intel shares plunge 28%, dragging down global chip stocks
next post
Strategic Investment from Sichuan Hebang Biotechnology

Related Posts

Southwest Airlines will charge to check bags for...

March 12, 2025

Lucid CEO steps down; EV maker plans to...

February 28, 2025

Here’s what has driven the Dow rally to...

May 18, 2024

Tesla shares rise on better-than-expected Q2 deliveries report

July 4, 2024

Boeing CEO says China has stopped taking its...

April 24, 2025

Kroger and Albertsons are spending billions to reward...

December 16, 2024

Treasury delays deadline for small businesses to file...

December 28, 2024

Nvidia loses nearly $600 billion in market value...

January 28, 2025

How UnitedHealthcare became the face of America’s health...

May 23, 2025

Here’s how Starbucks plans to improve its stores

July 2, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Strategic Chaos or Tactical Goldmine? What QQQ’s Chart is Whispering Right Now

      June 5, 2025
    • Why ADX Can Mislead You — And How to Avoid It

      June 5, 2025
    • S&P 500 on the Verge of 6,000: What’s at Stake?

      June 5, 2025
    • Speaker Johnson surprised by Musk’s criticism of ‘big, beautiful bill’: He’s ‘flat wrong’

      June 5, 2025
    • There’s a way to aid Gaza. I know, my foundation just helped deliver 7 million meals… without incident

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (967)
    • Investing (2,320)
    • Politics (2,873)
    • Stocks (1,054)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sportinvestorsleague.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 sportinvestorsleague.com | All Rights Reserved