Sport Investors League
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business

Sport Investors League

  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business
Business

Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

by admin August 3, 2024
August 3, 2024
Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has overturned a jury’s $4.7 billion verdict in the class-action lawsuit filed by “Sunday Ticket” subscribers against the NFL and has granted judgment to the NFL.

U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled Thursday that the testimony of two witnesses for the subscribers had flawed methodologies and should have been excluded.

“Without the testimonies of Dr. [Daniel] Rascher and Dr. [John] Zona, no reasonable jury could have found class-wide injury or damages,” Gutierrez wrote at the end of his 16-page ruling.

The jury on June 27 awarded $4.7 billion in damages to residential and commercial subscribers after it ruled the NFL violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses in the United States who paid for the package on DirecTV of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons.

The jury of five men and three women found the NFL liable for $4,610,331,671.74 in damages to the residential class (home subscribers) and $96,928,272.90 in damages to the commercial class (business subscribers).

Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could have been liable for $14,121,779,833.92.

It is not the first time the NFL has won a judgment as matter of law in this case, which has been going on since 2015.

In 2017, U.S. District Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell dismissed the lawsuit and ruled for the NFL because she said “Sunday Ticket” did not reduce output of NFL games and that even though DirecTV might have charged inflated prices, that did not “on its own, constitute harm to competition” because it had to negotiate with the NFL to carry the package.

Two years later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case.

It is likely the plaintiffs will again appeal to the 9th Circuit.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Intel shares plunge 28%, dragging down global chip stocks
next post
Strategic Investment from Sichuan Hebang Biotechnology

Related Posts

Western craze boosts sales of Levi denim dresses...

June 30, 2024

Starbucks imposes new limits on what baristas can...

April 24, 2025

Art created autonomously by AI can’t be copyrighted,...

March 21, 2025

Tesla’s Cybertruck recalled for a fourth time over...

June 27, 2024

LVMH and Formula One announce 10-year partnership

October 4, 2024

Citadel’s Ken Griffin buys a stegosaurus for $45...

July 19, 2024

Why some major artists are suddenly canceling shows,...

June 2, 2024

Walmart employees are now wearing body cameras in...

December 18, 2024

Joann to shutter all 800 fabric stores after...

February 26, 2025

Tariff threat looms over the year’s biggest electronics...

January 10, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Market Maker Manipulation; Oops, They Did It Again!

      May 14, 2025
    • 50% of S&P 500 Stocks Just Turned Bullish – What Happens Next?

      May 14, 2025
    • Bullish Breadth Improvement Suggests Further Upside For Stocks

      May 14, 2025
    • Tariff Tensions Ease, Nasdaq Soars — But is SMH the Emerging Leader?

      May 14, 2025
    • Lawsuit tracker: New resistance battling Trump’s second term through onslaught of lawsuits taking aim at EOs

      May 14, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (926)
    • Investing (2,165)
    • Politics (2,682)
    • Stocks (1,008)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sportinvestorsleague.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 sportinvestorsleague.com | All Rights Reserved