Sport Investors League
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business

Sport Investors League

  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business
Politics

Biden vs. Trump. Is a debate fair game to test mental acuity?

by admin June 27, 2024
June 27, 2024
Biden vs. Trump. Is a debate fair game to test mental acuity?

Presidential debates matter, but not always in the ways that the participants think. Seven years after the first ones, in 1960, Richard Nixon admitted that he felt his lack of proper makeup was a big factor in his losing the 1960 election to JFK. In reality, there was probably no amount of makeup that would have helped Nixon overcome the radiant clarity of his opponent. 

In perhaps the most famous moment of presidential debates, between President Reagan, then age 73, and former Vice President Walter Mondale, Reagan famously said, ‘I want you to know also I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent’s youth and inexperience.’ 

What may easily be overlooked in this seminal moment in debate history is not only the way that Reagan turned a seeming disadvantage into an advantage, but also the charm and humor and ease with which he did so. I am one who always felt Reagan’s acting skills were underrated, and they always served him well as president.

Flash forward to now, and this week’s upcoming CNN Presidential Debate simulcast on Fox Newsbetween former President Donald Trump and current President Joe Biden. If last weekend’s rally in Philadelphia is any indication, where Trump made cognitive comparisons between his unscripted dynamic Teleprompter-free style and Biden’s more wooden, halting manner (Trump also said Biden falls off the stage, etc.), it is clear that Trump intends to use both humor and bluster to attack his opponent directly.

But should President Biden’s or President Trump’s mental acuity or cognitive ability be fair game during the CNN Presidential Debate and what about their respective ages? (Trump is 78, Biden is 81). 

The answer is that mental acuity should be on the docket but not age. Ability and fitness to serve are important in leadership positions but are not always directly proportional to age. Keep in mind that we are talking about the highest office in the land, and that, despite a multitude of presidential advisers, mental alacrity remains at the top of the list when it comes to the rapid decisions necessary to protect this country, especially in a crisis. 

I think that Trump has a point when he says his unscripted articulations speaks to the point of cognitive prowess. When I interviewed him in 2020, he had no notes, did not seek the questions in advance, and in fact it was his complex, nuanced answers that impressed me, far more than his self-proclaimed results of a cognitive test of recall, ‘person, woman, man, camera, TV.’ 

When it comes to President Biden, the concerns come not from age or what the White House says are ‘doctored videos,’ or ‘cheap fakes,’ but more of a sense of increasing hesitancy, periods of confusion or problems of recall where he temporarily forgets the names of leaders including most recently Department of Homeland Security Secretary Mayorkas.

Should a debate be a forum to test cognitive ability and executive function, should the two debaters be able to contest what each other says directly, or should this be a debate in terms of dueling soliloquies only? I think the answer is obvious. We need to see the candidates in sharp contrast, with the more direct the interactions the better. 

President Biden is a good debater, as is former President Trump. President Biden’s last physical a few months ago lists him in excellent physical condition but does not specifically include cognitive testing or an MRI of the brain, and Trump has not recently released such testing either. But a debate is a good forum to assess alacrity, nimbleness, command, wisdom, and yes, even humor and wit. 

Charisma and personality have always influenced voters from the days of Reagan back to JFK, where no amount of makeup could have helped a wooden perspiring Nixon. And then, as now, the voters will decide.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Obama again stepping into role as Joe’s closer ahead of Trump v Biden rematch
next post
GOP lines up culture war-heavy spending bills targeting military abortions, drag shows

Related Posts

Trump-backed bill to avert government shutdown passes House...

March 12, 2025

Experts predict Supreme Court likely to stay out...

October 27, 2024

DNC insider claims Biden meeting with Obama, Democratic...

June 30, 2024

Trump campaign clarifies after candidate jokes about shooting...

November 4, 2024

US agriculture supply chain to be protected from...

March 12, 2025

Jimmy Carter ‘killer rabbit attack’ story highlighted his...

December 31, 2024

Senators confront Secret Service chief at Republican convention:...

July 18, 2024

Trump says he will meet with Putin, Zelenskyy...

May 29, 2025

RFK Jr attributes rise in autism to environmental...

April 17, 2025

US to host first AI safety network summit...

September 20, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Strategic Chaos or Tactical Goldmine? What QQQ’s Chart is Whispering Right Now

      June 5, 2025
    • Why ADX Can Mislead You — And How to Avoid It

      June 5, 2025
    • S&P 500 on the Verge of 6,000: What’s at Stake?

      June 5, 2025
    • Speaker Johnson surprised by Musk’s criticism of ‘big, beautiful bill’: He’s ‘flat wrong’

      June 5, 2025
    • There’s a way to aid Gaza. I know, my foundation just helped deliver 7 million meals… without incident

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (967)
    • Investing (2,320)
    • Politics (2,873)
    • Stocks (1,054)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sportinvestorsleague.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 sportinvestorsleague.com | All Rights Reserved