Sport Investors League
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business

Sport Investors League

  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Investing
  • Business
Politics

Top Dem’s past push for noncitizen voting rights revealed ahead of House vote

by admin May 24, 2024
May 24, 2024
Top Dem’s past push for noncitizen voting rights revealed ahead of House vote

A senior House Democrat previously advocated for noncitizen participation in the U.S. election system, arguing that the framers of the U.S. Constitution did not ‘intend’ for a citizenship requirement to vote, Fox News Digital has learned.

It comes as the House gears up to vote on a bill that would repeal a local law in Washington, D.C., granting noncitizen residents of the city the right to vote in local elections. 

The bill advanced through the House Oversight Committee in a 23-19 vote last summer and is expected for a House floor vote Thursday afternoon.

Among the Democrats who opposed it was Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the Oversight Committee’s ranking member, who authored a 1993 paper for the American University Washington College of Law, ‘Legal Aliens, Local Citizens: The Historical Constitutional and Theoretical Meanings of Alien Suffrage.’

‘In this Article, I will argue that the current blanket exclusion of noncitizens from the ballot is neither constitutionally required nor historically normal. Moreover, the disenfranchisement of aliens at the local level is vulnerable to deep theoretical objections since resident aliens — who are governed, taxed, and often drafted just like citizens — have a strong democratic claim to being considered members, indeed citizens, of their local communities,’ Raskin wrote in the paper.

In another section of the paper, Raskin noted that the Founding Fathers considered citizenship terms for officeholders in the White House and Congress but did not include the same for voters.

‘It can be safely concluded from the juxtaposition of the Framers’ specific and varying constitutional conditions for federal office-holding and their complete silence as to a citizenship qualification for federal voting that they did not intend to create a U.S. citizenship suffrage qualification,’ he wrote.

On the specific amendments that attach the word ‘citizen’ when describing voting rights, Raskin wrote, ‘If such language is not designed to exclude aliens from voting, perhaps it discloses a general understanding that voting is for citizens only. But this reading is badly strained: the language specifies only that states may not exclude any citizen from the franchise on the basis of race, not that the states may not include non-citizens in the franchise.’

He also argued that giving noncitizens the right to vote would have no bearing on their own naturalization process.

‘The simple right to vote in local elections, or even state and federal elections, neither confers U.S. citizenship for federal purposes nor immunizes aliens against the operation of any provision of immigration or naturalization law,’ Raskin wrote.

Raskin told Fox News Digital that he still stands by his belief in noncitizens voting in local elections but pointed out that it’s illegal on the federal level.

‘I stand by my academic conclusion that the Supreme Court has repeatedly stated that there’s nothing in the Constitution that prohibits non-citizens from voting in local elections. As a matter of public policy, localities have every reason to decide for themselves. Most states have allowed noncitizen voting at some point in their history and any attempt to demonize local noncitizen voting today is strange for Republicans given that they strongly supported this practice in the 19th century. Non-citizen voting in federal elections is against the law and not at issue in tomorrow’s vote,’ Raskin said.

The city of Takoma Park, which Raskin represents, shared a press release in October celebrating ’30 years of non-citizen voting’ in local elections.

The House’s D.C. noncitizens voting bill was introduced by Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas. Under a provision known as home rule, Congress is afforded the ability to block laws passed by the D.C. council.

Even if passed, however, it’s highly unlikely that the Democrat-controlled Senate takes it up.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Condor Energy
next post
Hamas’ Gaza health ministry under microscope as questions continue over number of deaths

Related Posts

Hawley says Mayorkas, Wray ‘absolutely’ skipped Senate hearing...

November 22, 2024

US scrambles as drones shape the landscape of...

November 23, 2024

AOC, ‘baby girl’ Marjorie Taylor Greene trade barbs...

May 17, 2024

Pressured by Trump’s Gaza plan, Arab countries meet...

March 5, 2025

Obama again stepping into role as Joe’s closer...

June 27, 2024

Tulsi Gabbard thanks Trump for ‘unwavering leadership’ in...

March 1, 2025

Army suspends commander after Trump, Vance, Hegseth vanish...

April 22, 2025

Ohio Democrat Sen. Sherrod Brown urges Biden to...

July 20, 2024

Pentagon ‘fundamentally rejects’ ICC decision to issue arrest...

November 22, 2024

Sanders doubles down on his criticism of Democrats,...

November 11, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Strategic Chaos or Tactical Goldmine? What QQQ’s Chart is Whispering Right Now

      June 5, 2025
    • Why ADX Can Mislead You — And How to Avoid It

      June 5, 2025
    • S&P 500 on the Verge of 6,000: What’s at Stake?

      June 5, 2025
    • Speaker Johnson surprised by Musk’s criticism of ‘big, beautiful bill’: He’s ‘flat wrong’

      June 5, 2025
    • There’s a way to aid Gaza. I know, my foundation just helped deliver 7 million meals… without incident

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (967)
    • Investing (2,320)
    • Politics (2,873)
    • Stocks (1,054)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sportinvestorsleague.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 sportinvestorsleague.com | All Rights Reserved